↓ Skip to main content

A Psychological Foundation for Team-Based Learning: Knowledge Reconsolidation.

Overview of attention for article published in Academic medicine, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Psychological Foundation for Team-Based Learning: Knowledge Reconsolidation.
Published in
Academic medicine, December 2019
DOI 10.1097/acm.0000000000002810
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henk G. Schmidt, Jerome I. Rotgans, Preman Rajalingam, Naomi Low-Beer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 10%
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 21 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 27%
Psychology 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Unspecified 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 24 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,124,137
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Academic medicine
#2,129
of 6,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,103
of 473,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic medicine
#67
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.