↓ Skip to main content

Effect of TENS on pain in relation to central sensitization in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Effect of TENS on pain in relation to central sensitization in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Beckwée, Willem De Hertogh, Pierre Lievens, Ivan Bautmans, Peter Vaes

Abstract

Central sensitization has recently been documented in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OAk). So far, the presence of central sensitization has not been considered as a confounding factor in studies assessing the pain inhibitory effect of tens on osteoarthritis of the knee. The purpose of this study is to explore the pain inhibitory effect of burst tens in OAk patients and to explore the prognostic value of central sensitization on the pain inhibitory effect of tens in OAk patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 175 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Researcher 12 7%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 55 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 20%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 60 34%