| Title |
Native faunal communities depend on habitat from non-native plants in novel but not in natural ecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1059-0 |
| Authors |
Jasmin G. Packer, Steve Delean, Christoph Kueffer, Jane Prider, Kirstin Abley, José M. Facelli, Susan M. Carthew |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 37% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,173,631
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#490
of 2,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,963
of 304,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.