| Title |
Functional Neural Correlates of Anosognosia in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease: a Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychology Review, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11065-019-09410-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jaime D. Mondragón, Natasha M. Maurits, Peter P. De Deyn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Greece | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,385,125
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#77
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,803
of 351,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.