↓ Skip to main content

The Activities of Current Antimalarial Drugs on the Life Cycle Stages of Plasmodium: A Comparative Study with Human and Rodent Parasites

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
719 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Activities of Current Antimalarial Drugs on the Life Cycle Stages of Plasmodium: A Comparative Study with Human and Rodent Parasites
Published in
PLOS Medicine, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Delves, David Plouffe, Christian Scheurer, Stephan Meister, Sergio Wittlin, Elizabeth A. Winzeler, Robert E. Sinden, Didier Leroy

Abstract

Malaria remains a disease of devastating global impact, killing more than 800,000 people every year-the vast majority being children under the age of 5. While effective therapies are available, if malaria is to be eradicated a broader range of small molecule therapeutics that are able to target the liver and the transmissible sexual stages are required. These new medicines are needed both to meet the challenge of malaria eradication and to circumvent resistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 719 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
India 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Ghana 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 689 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 132 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 125 17%
Researcher 111 15%
Student > Bachelor 90 13%
Student > Postgraduate 41 6%
Other 98 14%
Unknown 122 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 189 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 106 15%
Chemistry 103 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 47 7%
Other 69 10%
Unknown 142 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,528,389
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#2,057
of 5,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,039
of 168,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#24
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.