| Title |
Complications in internal jugular vs subclavian ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization: a comparative randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05651-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hyun-Jung Shin, Hyo-Seok Na, Won-Uk Koh, Young-Jin Ro, Jung-Man Lee, Yoon-Ji Choi, Seongjoo Park, Jin-Hee Kim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 8% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 26 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,681,520
of 24,843,842 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,403
of 5,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,666
of 356,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#48
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,843,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.