↓ Skip to main content

Reducing failures of working memory with performance feedback

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Reducing failures of working memory with performance feedback
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1019-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsten C. S. Adam, Edward K. Vogel

Abstract

Fluctuations in attentional control can lead to failures of working memory (WM), in which the subject is no better than chance at reporting items from a recent display. In three experiments, we used a whole-report measure of visual WM to examine the impact of feedback on the rate of failures. In each experiment, subjects remembered an array of colored items across a blank delay, and then reported the identity of items using a whole-report procedure. In Experiment 1, we gave subjects simple feedback about the number of items they correctly identified at the end of each trial. In Experiment 2, we gave subjects additional information about the cumulative number of items correctly identified within each block. Finally, in Experiment 3, we gave subjects weighted feedback in which poor trials resulted in lost points and consistent successful performance received "streak" points. Surprisingly, simple feedback (Exp. 1) was ineffective at improving average performance or decreasing the rate of poor-performance trials. Simple cumulative feedback (Exp. 2) modestly decreased poor-performance trials (by 7 %). Weighted feedback produced the greatest benefits, decreasing the frequency of poor-performance trials by 28 % relative to baseline performance. This set of results demonstrates the usefulness of whole-report WM measures for investigating the effects of feedback on WM performance. Further, we showed that only a feedback structure that specifically discouraged lapses using negative feedback led to large reductions in WM failures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 31%
Student > Master 12 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 55%
Neuroscience 15 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 11%