| Title |
Point defect populations of forsterite revealed by two-stage metastable hydroxylation experiments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00410-019-1590-6 |
| Authors |
Charles Le Losq, Michael C. Jollands, Peter M. E. Tollan, Rhys Hawkins, Hugh St. C. O’Neill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 30% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 20% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#552
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,964
of 351,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.