You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predictive Factors for the Benefit of Perioperative FOLFOX for Resectable Liver Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Patients (EORTC Intergroup Trial 40983)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgery, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1097/sla.0b013e3182456aa2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Halfdan Sorbye, Murielle Mauer, Thomas Gruenberger, Bengt Glimelius, Graeme J. Poston, Peter M. Schlag, Philippe Rougier, Wolf O. Bechstein, John N. Primrose, Euan T. Walpole, Meg Finch-Jones, Daniel Jaeck, Darius Mirza, Rowan W. Parks, Laurence Collette, Eric Van Cutsem, Werner Scheithauer, Manfred P. Lutz, Bernard Nordlinger |
| Abstract |
In EORTC study 40983, perioperative FOLFOX increased progression-free survival (PFS) compared with surgery alone for patients with initially 1 to 4 resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted an exploratory retrospective analysis to identify baseline factors possibly predictive for a benefit of perioperative FOLFOX on PFS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Sweden | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,332,572
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#3,697
of 9,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,965
of 168,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#17
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.