↓ Skip to main content

(Neuro)Psychological Interventions for Non-Motor Symptoms in the Treatment of Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: a Systematic Umbrella Review

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
(Neuro)Psychological Interventions for Non-Motor Symptoms in the Treatment of Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: a Systematic Umbrella Review
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, June 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11065-019-09409-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanna Kampling, Lisa K. Brendel, Oskar Mittag

Abstract

Conducted in a multidisciplinary and multimodal setting, the main objectives of neuropsychological treatment are to improve cognition, alleviate affective disorders, and to promote activities and participation. This article reviews the evidence on therapeutic or educative interventions based on psychological principles for patients with Parkinson's disease. The electronic bibliographic databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, and CINAHL were systematically searched for meta-analyses on psychological interventions for patients with Parkinson's disease, published from January 2000 to June 2018. We extracted psychological interventions, non-motor outcomes, effect sizes, confidence intervals, and I2 heterogeneity statistics. In addition, we rated the level of evidence on an intervention's effectiveness regarding a specific outcome. We identified 15 meta-analyses out of 1084 search results and identified a broad variety of psychological interventions for non-motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease. In total, 48 outcome-intervention-pairs were extracted. Psychotherapy, mind and body interventions, and cognitive training are promising treatment approaches when addressing cognition, depression, and QoL in patients with Parkinson's disease. The available evidence on the effectiveness of psychological interventions in the treatment of symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease is very heterogeneous. Still, our review reveals that some interventions are appropriate and effective for a variety of symptoms. Primary studies are not considered in this review, resulting in the omission of potentially relevant findings. Further high-quality research is needed to confirm the existing evidence and to explore the potential of psychological interventions for patients with Parkinson's disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 31 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 18%
Psychology 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 30 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,322,694
of 23,565,002 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#344
of 467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,494
of 354,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,565,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.