↓ Skip to main content

Caregiver burden in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cross-sectional investigation of predictors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Caregiver burden in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a cross-sectional investigation of predictors
Published in
Journal of Neurology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00415-015-7746-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Burke, Marwa Elamin, Miriam Galvin, Orla Hardiman, Niall Pender

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate whether cognitive and behavioural impairment in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) contributes to caregiver burden, and whether carer burden affects patient outcome. Thirty-three dyads of incident patients with ALS and their primary caregivers (n = 33) completed a series of measures to determine cognitive and behavioural profiles, (patients) and carer burden (carers) to investigate the psychological impact of ALS, and the impact of behavioural change since the onset of ALS. Caregivers were divided into high- and low-burden groups using previously established norms. High burden in carers was associated with significantly higher apathy (p = 0.009), disinhibition (p = 0.005), and executive dysfunction (p = 0.015) in patients. Regression analyses for burden confirmed significant predictors such as change in apathy (r = 0.390, F = 5.19, p = 0.03), disinhibition (r = 0.530, F = 11.32, p = 0.002), and executive dysfunction (r = 0.372, F = 4.66, p = 0.039), with total behaviour change contributing to 31 % of caregiver burden (r = 0.563, F = 4.17, p = 0.015). Total distress as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was also a significant predictor of caregiver burden, contributing to 38.5 % of variance (r = 0.621, F = 18.79, p < 0.000). Caregiver burden did not affect survival (p = 0.496). Caregiver burden in ALS is modulated by patient's cognitive and behavioural status, but does not significantly impact patient survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 117 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 41 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 23%
Psychology 19 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 39 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,445,779
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,643
of 4,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,430
of 265,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#53
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.