↓ Skip to main content

What types of brokerage bridge the research-practice gap? The case of public school educators

Overview of attention for article published in Social Networks, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What types of brokerage bridge the research-practice gap? The case of public school educators
Published in
Social Networks, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.05.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Watling Neal, Zachary P. Neal, Kristen J. Mills, Jennifer A. Lawlor, Kathryn McAlindon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 18 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 23%
Psychology 7 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Engineering 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 21 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,432,274
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Social Networks
#273
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,241
of 363,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Networks
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.