↓ Skip to main content

Our Fallen Peers: A Mandate for Change

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Psychiatry, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Our Fallen Peers: A Mandate for Change
Published in
Academic Psychiatry, January 2014
DOI 10.1176/appi.ap.32.1.8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda L. M. Worley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Norway 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 24 25%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 36%
Psychology 21 22%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 16 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Academic Psychiatry
#1,120
of 1,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,987
of 319,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Psychiatry
#197
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.