↓ Skip to main content

Incidence and associations of acute kidney injury after major abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Incidence and associations of acute kidney injury after major abdominal surgery
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4157-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. E. O’Connor, C. J. Kirwan, R. M. Pearse, J. R. Prowle

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a recognised risk factor for adverse outcomes in critical illness and hospitalised patients in general. To understand the incidence and associations of AKI as a peri-operative complication of major abdominal surgery, we conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Using a systematic strategy, we searched the electronic reference databases for articles describing post-operative renal outcomes using consensus criteria for AKI diagnosis (RIFLE, AKIN or KDIGO) in the setting of major abdominal surgery. Pooled incidence of AKI and, where reported, pooled relative risk of death after post-operative AKI were estimated using random effects models. From 4287 screened titles, 19 articles met our inclusion criteria describing AKI outcomes in 82,514 patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Pooled incidence of AKI was 13.4 % (95 % CI 10.9-16.4 %). In eight studies that reported the short-term mortality, relative risk of death in the presence of post-operative AKI was 12.6 fold (95 % CI, 6.8-23.4). Where reported, length of stay was greater and non-renal post-operative complications were also more frequent in patients experiencing AKI. Using modern consensus definitions, AKI is a common complication of major abdominal surgery that is associated with adverse patient outcomes including death. While a causative role for AKI cannot be concluded from this analysis, as an important signal of peri-operative harm, AKI should be regarded as an important surgical outcome measure and potential target for clinical interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 39 28%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 28 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,098
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,924
of 399,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#19
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.