↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: Examining the Link Between Autistic Traits and Compulsive Internet Use in a Non-Clinical Sample

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Brief Report: Examining the Link Between Autistic Traits and Compulsive Internet Use in a Non-Clinical Sample
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1465-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catrin Finkenauer, Monique M. H. Pollmann, Sander Begeer, Peter Kerkhof

Abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorders or autistic traits may profit from Internet and computer-mediated interactions, but there is concern about their Internet use becoming compulsive. This study investigated the link between autistic traits and Internet use in a 2-wave longitudinal study with a non-clinical community sample (n = 390). As compared to people with less autistic traits, people with more autistic traits did not report a higher frequency of Internet use, but they were more prone to compulsive Internet use. For women, more autistic traits predicted an increase in compulsive Internet use over time. These results suggest that, despite its appeal for people with autistic traits, the Internet carries the risk of compulsive use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 21%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Social Sciences 10 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,862,230
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#764
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,360
of 259,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#7
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.