↓ Skip to main content

Metabolic and transcriptional response of central metabolism affected by root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica under salinity in barley

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Metabolic and transcriptional response of central metabolism affected by root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica under salinity in barley
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11103-016-0461-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Reza Ghaffari, Mehdi Ghabooli, Behnam Khatabi, Mohammad Reza Hajirezaei, Patrick Schweizer, Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh

Abstract

The root endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica enhances plant adaptation to environmental stress based on general and non-specific plant species mechanisms. In the present study, we integrated the ionomics, metabolomics, and transcriptomics data to identify the genes and metabolic regulatory networks conferring salt tolerance in P. indica-colonized barley plants. To this end, leaf samples were harvested at control (0 mM NaCl) and severe salt stress (300 mM NaCl) in P. indica-colonized and non-inoculated barley plants 4 weeks after fungal inoculation. The metabolome analysis resulted in an identification of a signature containing 14 metabolites and ions conferring tolerance to salt stress. Gene expression analysis has led to the identification of 254 differentially expressed genes at 0 mM NaCl and 391 genes at 300 mM NaCl in P. indica-colonized compared to non-inoculated samples. The integration of metabolome and transcriptome analysis indicated that the major and minor carbohydrate metabolism, nitrogen metabolism, and ethylene biosynthesis pathway might play a role in systemic salt-tolerance in leaf tissue induced by the root-colonized fungus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 25%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#18,445,779
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#2,492
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,287
of 298,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#26
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.