↓ Skip to main content

A Boolean Model of the Gene Regulatory Network Underlying Mammalian Cortical Area Development

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Boolean Model of the Gene Regulatory Network Underlying Mammalian Cortical Area Development
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare E. Giacomantonio, Geoffrey J. Goodhill

Abstract

The cerebral cortex is divided into many functionally distinct areas. The emergence of these areas during neural development is dependent on the expression patterns of several genes. Along the anterior-posterior axis, gradients of Fgf8, Emx2, Pax6, Coup-tfi, and Sp8 play a particularly strong role in specifying areal identity. However, our understanding of the regulatory interactions between these genes that lead to their confinement to particular spatial patterns is currently qualitative and incomplete. We therefore used a computational model of the interactions between these five genes to determine which interactions, and combinations of interactions, occur in networks that reproduce the anterior-posterior expression patterns observed experimentally. The model treats expression levels as Boolean, reflecting the qualitative nature of the expression data currently available. We simulated gene expression patterns created by all possible networks containing the five genes of interest. We found that only of these networks were able to reproduce the experimentally observed expression patterns. These networks all lacked certain interactions and combinations of interactions including auto-regulation and inductive loops. Many higher order combinations of interactions also never appeared in networks that satisfied our criteria for good performance. While there was remarkable diversity in the structure of the networks that perform well, an analysis of the probability of each interaction gave an indication of which interactions are most likely to be present in the gene network regulating cortical area development. We found that in general, repressive interactions are much more likely than inductive ones, but that mutually repressive loops are not critical for correct network functioning. Overall, our model illuminates the design principles of the gene network regulating cortical area development, and makes novel predictions that can be tested experimentally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Germany 5 4%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 111 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 29%
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 29%
Computer Science 15 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 11%
Physics and Astronomy 9 7%
Engineering 7 6%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2012.
All research outputs
#20,859,545
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,265
of 9,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,363
of 99,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#49
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.