| Title |
The Provision of Interventional Radiology Services in Europe: CIRSE Recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00270-016-1299-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dimitrios Tsetis, Raman Uberoi, Fabrizio Fanelli, Iain Roberston, Miltiadis Krokidis, Otto van Delden, Boris Radeleff, Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck, Malgorzata Szerbo-Trojanowska, Michael Lee, Robert Morgan, Elias Brountzos, Anna Maria Belli |
| Abstract |
Interventional Radiology (IR) is an essential part of modern medicine, delivering minimally invasive patient-focused care, which has been proven to be safe and effective in both elective and emergency settings. The aim of this document is to outline the core requirements and standards for the provision of Interventional Radiological services, including training, certification, manpower, and accreditation. The ultimate challenge will be the adoption of these recommendations by different countries and health economies around the world, in turn ensuring equal access to IR treatments for all patients, the appropriate distribution of resources for IR service provision as well as the continued development of safe and high-quality IR services in Europe and beyond. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Greece | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,407,871
of 23,337,345 outputs
Outputs from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#459
of 2,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,334
of 402,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,337,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.