↓ Skip to main content

The state of the art in breast imaging using the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope: results from 31 measurements on malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
Title
The state of the art in breast imaging using the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope: results from 31 measurements on malignancies
Published in
European Radiology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00330-016-4240-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Heijblom, Daniele Piras, Frank M. van den Engh, Margreet van der Schaaf, Joost M. Klaase, Wiendelt Steenbergen, Srirang Manohar

Abstract

Photoacoustic mammography is potentially an ideal technique, however, the amount of patient data is limited. To further our understanding of the in vivo performance of the method and to guide further research and development, we imaged 33 breast malignancies using the research system - the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope (PAM). Thirty-one patients participated in this retrospective, observational study. The study and informed consent procedure were approved by the local ethics committee. PAM uses 1,064 nm light for excitation with a planar, 588-element, 1-MHz ultrasound array for detection. Photoacoustic lesion visibility and appearance were compared with conventional imaging (x-ray mammography and ultrasonography) findings, histopathology and patient demographics. Of 33 malignancies 32 were visualized with high contrast and good co-localization with conventional imaging. The contrast of the detected malignancies was independent of radiographic breast density, and size estimation was reasonably good with an average 28 % deviation from histology. However, the presence of contrast areas outside the malignant region is suggestive for low specificity of the current system. Statistical analyses did not reveal any further relationship between PAM results and patient demographics nor lesion characteristics. The results confirm the high potential of photoacoustic mammography in future breast care. • Photoacoustic breast imaging visualizes malignancies with high imaging contrast. • Photoacoustic lesion contrast is independent of the mammographically estimated breast density. • No clear relationship exists between photoacoustic characteristics and lesion type, grade, etc. • Photoacoustic specificity to breast cancer from some cases is not yet optimal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 9 7%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 36 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 33 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Physics and Astronomy 17 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 34 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,376,016
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,102
of 4,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,361
of 298,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#18
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.