You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of performance, microorganism populations, and bio-physiochemical properties of granular and flocculent sludge from denitrifying phosphorus removal reactors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemical Engineering Journal, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.065 |
| Authors |
Yayi Wang, Xuxin Jiang, Hong Wang, Gang Guo, Jianhua Guo, Jian Qin, Shuai Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 16 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Engineering Journal
#4,922
of 6,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,091
of 361,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Engineering Journal
#42
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,301 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.