| Title |
Hydropower and the future of Amazonian biodiversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1072-3 |
| Authors |
Alexander C. Lees, Carlos A. Peres, Philip M. Fearnside, Maurício Schneider, Jansen A. S. Zuanon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 16% |
| Australia | 3 | 12% |
| Colombia | 2 | 8% |
| Brazil | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Scientists | 9 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 605 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 592 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 105 | 17% |
| Researcher | 89 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 7% |
| Other | 107 | 18% |
| Unknown | 132 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 182 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 148 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 3% |
| Engineering | 18 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 64 | 11% |
| Unknown | 161 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#485,058
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#46
of 2,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,615
of 317,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.