↓ Skip to main content

Cannabis use and psychosis: a review of clinical and epidemiological evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cannabis use and psychosis: a review of clinical and epidemiological evidence
Published in
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, November 2016
DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2000.00685.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wayne Hall, Louisa Degenhardt

Abstract

This paper evaluates evidence for two hypotheses about the relationship between cannabis use and psychosis: (i) that heavy cannabis use causes a 'cannabis psychosis', i.e. a psychotic disorder that would not have occurred in the absence of cannabis use and which can be recognised by its pattern of symptoms and their relationship to cannabis use; and (ii) that cannabis use may precipitate schizophrenia, or exacerbate its symptoms. Literature relevant to drug use and schizophrenia is reviewed. There is limited clinical evidence for the first hypothesis. If 'cannabis psychoses' exist, they seem to be rare, because they require very high doses of tetrahydrocannabinol, the prolonged use of highly potent forms of cannabis, or a preexisting (but as yet unspecified) vulnerability, or both. There is more support for the second hypothesis in that a large prospective study has shown a linear relationship between the frequency with which cannabis had been used by age 18 and the risk over the subsequent 15 years of receiving a diagnosis of schizophrenia. It is still unclear whether this means that cannabis use precipitates schizophrenia, whether cannabis use is a form of 'self-medication', or whether the association is due to the use of other drugs, such as amphetamines, which heavy cannabis users are more likely to use. There is better clinical and epidemiological evidence that cannabis use can exacerbate the symptoms of schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 166 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 21%
Researcher 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 20 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 30 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,646,911
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#432
of 2,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,348
of 420,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#32
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.