↓ Skip to main content

Making the Case for Critical Q Methodology

Overview of attention for article published in The Professional Geographer, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Making the Case for Critical Q Methodology
Published in
The Professional Geographer, June 2019
DOI 10.1080/00330124.2019.1598271
Authors

Gretchen Sneegas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 30%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Psychology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,567,544
of 24,689,476 outputs
Outputs from The Professional Geographer
#98
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,712
of 357,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Professional Geographer
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,689,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.