You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changing oral vaccine to inactivated polio vaccine might increase mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00661-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleanor N Fish, Kate L Flanagan, David Furman, Sabra L Klein, Tobias R Kollmann, Dorthe L Jeppesen, Ofer Levy, Arnaud Marchant, Siva Namachivayam, Mihai G Netea, Magdalena Plebanski, Sarah L Rowland-Jones, Liisa K Selin, Frank Shann, Hilton C Whittle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Denmark | 2 | 7% |
| Malawi | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 63% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 33% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,440,861
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#10,115
of 42,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,491
of 312,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#174
of 448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.