| Title |
ELS (Ethical Life Support): a new teaching tool for medical ethics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2474-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marco Vergano, Giuseppe Naretto, Fabrizio Elia, Enrico Gandolfo, Chiara Nebris Calliera, Giuseppe R. Gristina |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,345,078
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,693
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,854
of 366,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#59
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.