| Title |
Deciding when to lend a helping hand: a decision-making framework for seabird island restoration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1079-9 |
| Authors |
Rachel T. Buxton, Christopher J. Jones, Philip O’Brien Lyver, David R. Towns, Stephanie B. Borrelle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,670,785
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#682
of 2,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,076
of 306,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.