↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Chemical Mimicry by Aphid Predators Depends on Aphid-Learning by Ants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of Chemical Mimicry by Aphid Predators Depends on Aphid-Learning by Ants
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10886-016-0676-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masayuki Hayashi, Masashi Nomura, Kiyoshi Nakamuta

Abstract

Chemical mimicry is an effective strategy when signal receivers recognize and discriminate models by relying on chemical cues. Some aphid enemies mimic the cuticular chemicals of aphids through various means thus avoiding detection and attack by aphid-tending ants. However, because ants have been reported to learn the chemical signatures of aphids in order to distinguish the aphids, the efficacy of chemical mimicry is predicted to depend on the experience of the ants that had tended aphids. The present study tested this hypothesis using two predator species: larvae of the green lacewing Mallada desjardinsi, and larvae of the ladybeetle Scymnus posticalis. Lacewing larvae carry the carcasses of aphids on which they have preyed upon their backs, and these function via chemical camouflage to reduce the aggressiveness of aphid-tending ants toward the larvae. Ladybeetle larvae reportedly produce a covering of wax structures, and their chemicals appear to attenuate ant aggression. We examined whether the behavior of the ant Tetramorium tsushimae toward these predators changed depending on their aphid-tending experience. Ants moderated their aggressiveness toward both predators when they had previously tended aphids, indicating that chemical mimicry by both aphid predators is dependent on previous experience of the ants in tending aphids. Chemical mimicry by the predators of ant-tended aphids is therefore considered to exploit learning-dependent aphid recognition systems of ants.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 16%
Other 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%