You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Costs and Opportunities for Preserving Coastal Wetlands under Sea Level Rise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12239 |
| Authors |
Rebecca K. Runting, Catherine E. Lovelock, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Jonathan R. Rhodes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 70% |
| Scientists | 10 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 147 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 20% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 51 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,883,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#539
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,600
of 313,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.