You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.05.016 |
| Authors |
Julian J. O’Grady, Barry W. Brook, David H. Reed, Jonathan D. Ballou, David W. Tonkyn, Richard Frankham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 783 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 1% |
| Brazil | 9 | 1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 729 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 161 | 21% |
| Researcher | 158 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 112 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 103 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 5% |
| Other | 122 | 16% |
| Unknown | 90 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 460 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 107 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 61 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | <1% |
| Other | 26 | 3% |
| Unknown | 111 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,444,780
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,226
of 6,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,615
of 91,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.