You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CCC- and WASH-mediated endosomal sorting of LDLR is required for normal clearance of circulating LDL
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms10961 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paulina Bartuzi, Daniel D. Billadeau, Robert Favier, Shunxing Rong, Daphne Dekker, Alina Fedoseienko, Hille Fieten, Melinde Wijers, Johannes H. Levels, Nicolette Huijkman, Niels Kloosterhuis, Henk van der Molen, Gemma Brufau, Albert K. Groen, Alison M. Elliott, Jan Albert Kuivenhoven, Barbara Plecko, Gernot Grangl, Julie McGaughran, Jay D. Horton, Ezra Burstein, Marten H. Hofker, Bart van de Sluis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 42% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 18% |
| Researcher | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 61 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,841,470
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#37,880
of 58,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,231
of 316,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#534
of 890 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 890 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.