↓ Skip to main content

Chocolate and Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Chocolate and Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11883-011-0203-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Owais Khawaja, J. Michael Gaziano, Luc Djoussé

Abstract

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in the United States. The high content of polyphenols and flavonoids present in cocoa has been reported to play an important protective role in the development of CHD. Although studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of chocolate on endothelial function, blood pressure, serum lipids, insulin resistance, and platelet function, it is unclear whether chocolate consumption influences the risk of CHD. This article reviews current evidence on the effects of cocoa/chocolate on clinical and subclinical CHD, CHD risk factors, and potential biologic mechanisms. It also discusses major limitations of currently available data and future directions in the field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 78 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 6 7%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,903,374
of 24,835,862 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#109
of 834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,746
of 129,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,835,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.