↓ Skip to main content

Using synthetic semiochemicals to train canines to detect bark beetle–infested trees

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Forest Science , May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Using synthetic semiochemicals to train canines to detect bark beetle–infested trees
Published in
Annals of Forest Science , May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13595-019-0841-z
Authors

Annette Johansson, Göran Birgersson, Fredrik Schlyter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 31%
Environmental Science 6 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,764,275
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#246
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,422
of 364,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.