↓ Skip to main content

Topical Retinoids: Therapeutic Mechanisms in the Treatment of Photodamaged Skin

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 1,032)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Topical Retinoids: Therapeutic Mechanisms in the Treatment of Photodamaged Skin
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40257-016-0185-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan R. Riahi, Amelia E. Bush, Philip R. Cohen

Abstract

Retinoids are a group of substances comprising vitamin A and its natural and synthetic derivatives. Retinoids were first used in dermatology in 1943 by Straumfjord for acne vulgaris. Since that time, retinoids have been utilized in the management and treatment of various skin conditions, including photoaging. Photodamage of the skin occurs as a consequence of cumulative exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) and is characterized by deep wrinkles, easy bruising, inelasticity, mottled pigmentation, roughness, and telangiectasias. The mechanism of UVR-induced photodamage is multifactorial. Retinoids have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of photoaged skin. Indeed, understanding the pathophysiology of photoaging and the molecular mechanism of retinoids can not only provide insight into the effects retinoids can exert in treating photoaging but also provide the rationale for their use in the treatment of other dermatologic diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 14%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 9 6%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 69 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 11%
Chemistry 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 71 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#574,483
of 24,255,619 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#22
of 1,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,697
of 304,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,255,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.