↓ Skip to main content

Neurochemical Enhancement of Conscious Error Awareness

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
reddit
1 Redditor
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurochemical Enhancement of Conscious Error Awareness
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, February 2012
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.4052-11.2012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Hester, L. Sanjay Nandam, Redmond G. O'Connell, Joe Wagner, Mark Strudwick, Pradeep J. Nathan, Jason B. Mattingley, Mark A. Bellgrove

Abstract

How the brain monitors ongoing behavior for performance errors is a central question of cognitive neuroscience. Diminished awareness of performance errors limits the extent to which humans engage in corrective behavior and has been linked to loss of insight in a number of psychiatric syndromes (e.g., attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, drug addiction). These conditions share alterations in monoamine signaling that may influence the neural mechanisms underlying error processing, but our understanding of the neurochemical drivers of these processes is limited. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over design of the influence of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and citalopram on error awareness in 27 healthy participants. The error awareness task, a go/no-go response inhibition paradigm, was administered to assess the influence of monoaminergic agents on performance errors during fMRI data acquisition. A single dose of methylphenidate, but not atomoxetine or citalopram, significantly improved the ability of healthy volunteers to consciously detect performance errors. Furthermore, this behavioral effect was associated with a strengthening of activation differences in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and inferior parietal lobe during the methylphenidate condition for errors made with versus without awareness. Our results have implications for the understanding of the neurochemical underpinnings of performance monitoring and for the pharmacological treatment of a range of disparate clinical conditions that are marked by poor awareness of errors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 210 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 19%
Researcher 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 39 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 77 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 11%
Neuroscience 24 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 1%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 49 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,881,818
of 23,573,357 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#6,553
of 23,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,447
of 157,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#63
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.