↓ Skip to main content

Antibacterial activity of curcumin via apoptosis-like response in Escherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Antibacterial activity of curcumin via apoptosis-like response in Escherichia coli
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00253-016-7415-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dae Gyu Yun, Dong Gun Lee

Abstract

Curcumin, a naturally occurring phenolic compound, has been shown to exhibit antimicrobial activity against Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, etc., but the mechanism remains unclear. The present study was designed to investigate the novel antibacterial mechanism of curcumin that shows an apoptosis-like response in E. coli. We found that curcumin induces membrane damage at relatively high concentrations, but there was no effect at the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). At the MIC, curcumin-treated cells displayed various apoptotic markers such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, membrane depolarization, and Ca(2+) influx. Expression of RecA protein, which mediates a bacterial apoptosis-like response, was also increased by curcumin. In order to evaluate the influence of RecA on the appearance of other apoptotic markers, phosphatidylserine (PS) exposure and DNA fragmentation were examined and compared with a RecA deletion strain (ΔRecA). These markers were detected in E. coli wild-type cells, but not in ΔRecA cells. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that curcumin induces an apoptosis-like response in E. coli that involves RecA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 41 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Chemistry 5 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 46 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,371,088
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5,817
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,198
of 304,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#76
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.