↓ Skip to main content

Improving Social Initiations in Young Children with Autism Using Reinforcers with Embedded Social Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Social Initiations in Young Children with Autism Using Reinforcers with Embedded Social Interactions
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10803-009-0732-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert L. Koegel, Ty W. Vernon, Lynn K. Koegel

Abstract

Children with autism often exhibit low levels of social engagement, decreased levels of eye contact, and low social affect. However, both the literature and our direct clinical observations suggest that some components of intervention procedures may result in improvement in child-initiated social areas. Using an ABAB research design with three children with autism, this study systematically assessed whether embedding social interactions into reinforcers, delivered during language intervention, would lead to increased levels of child-initiated social behaviors. We compared this condition with a language intervention condition that did not embed social interactions into the reinforcers. Results indicated that embedding social interactions into the reinforcers resulted in increases in child-initiated social engagement during communication, improved nonverbal dyadic orienting, and improvements in general child affect. Theoretical and applied implications are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 210 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 49 22%
Unknown 29 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 84 37%
Social Sciences 41 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 8 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 40 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,018,605
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,728
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,996
of 96,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.