You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preparation of nanoliposome loaded with peanut peptide fraction: stability and bioavailability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food & Function, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1039/c5fo01612f |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kui-Jie Gong, Ai-Min Shi, Hong-Zhi Liu, Li Liu, Hui Hu, Ying Yang, Benu Adhikari, Qiang Wang |
| Abstract |
Nanoliposome loaded with peanut peptide fraction (PPF) prepared by high pressure microfluidization (HPM) treatment was investigated as well as its stability and bioavailability. PPF showed hydrophilicity character with a solubility of 97.50 ± 2.31 mg mL(-1) in aqueous solution. HPM treatment can prepare nanoliposome but decreased encapsulation efficiency (EE). A pressure of 120 MPa was the appropriate parameter where the particle size and EE of nanolipsome was 79.67 ± 1.85 nm and 65.12 ± 2.96%, respectively. Crude liposome and nanoliposome both showed good stability under different pH conditions, even at pH value of 2.0. Nanoliposome behaved better in vitro controlled release than crude liposome. Most important of all, nanoliposome had the highest angiotension converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity after simulated gastrointestinal tract (GIT) digestion. Morphology of digested liposome proved that nanoliposome can keep relative integrity in structure although it suffered a lot of attack. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 18 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,315,221
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Food & Function
#3,072
of 4,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,662
of 393,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food & Function
#257
of 364 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 364 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.