↓ Skip to main content

Immunopathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus pulmonary infection

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Immunopathology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
Immunopathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus pulmonary infection
Published in
Seminars in Immunopathology, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00281-011-0291-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dane Parker, Alice Prince

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a common human pathogen highly evolved as both a component of the commensal flora and as a major cause of invasive infection. Severe respiratory infection due to staphylococci has been increasing due to the prevalence of more virulent USA300 CA-MRSA strains in the general population. The ability of S. aureus to adapt to the milieu of the respiratory tract has facilitated its emergence as a respiratory pathogen. Its metabolic versatility, the ability to scavenge iron, coordinate gene expression, and the horizontal acquisition of useful genetic elements have all contributed to its success as a component of the respiratory flora, in hospitalized patients, as a complication of influenza and in normal hosts. The expression of surface adhesins facilitates its persistence in the airways. In addition, the highly sophisticated interactions of the multiple S. aureus virulence factors, particularly the α-hemolysin and protein A, with diverse immune effectors in the lung such as ADAM10, TNFR1, EGFR, immunoglobulin, and complement all contribute to the pathogenesis of staphylococcal pneumonia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 172 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 33 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,674,740
of 24,840,108 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Immunopathology
#63
of 565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,793
of 146,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Immunopathology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,840,108 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.