↓ Skip to main content

Sustained effects for training of smooth pursuit plasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Sustained effects for training of smooth pursuit plasticity
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00221-012-3009-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Eibenberger, Michael Ring, Thomas Haslwanter

Abstract

Maintaining orientation in space is a multisensory process, with the vestibular, visual, auditory and somatosensory systems as inputs. Since the input from each individual system changes, for example due to aging, the central nervous system must continuously adapt to these changes to maintain proper system performance. Changes can also be elicited by targeted modifications of the inputs, or by controlled training of sensory systems. While the effects of adaptation on eye movements elicited by the vestibulo-ocular reflex are well established, modifications of the efficacy of smooth pursuit eye movements are less well understood. We have investigated whether two 6-min training sessions on three subsequent days can induce lasting changes in the open- and closed-loop smooth pursuit performance of healthy, adult subjects. Ten subjects practiced making pursuit eye movements by tracking a target cross which moved quasi-randomly on a computer screen. Smooth pursuit performance was tested with a step-ramp paradigm immediately before and after the training, as well as 5 days after the last training session. Our results show that even such short training sessions can induce significant, lasting improvements in closed-loop smooth pursuit performance if the pursuit system of the subjects is challenged sufficiently during training. Control experiments on ten additional adult subjects who had their pursuit performance tested before and after a 20 min break without visual training confirmed that the pursuit enhancement is due to the visual training and not due to perceptual learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 3%
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 22%
Neuroscience 10 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2012.
All research outputs
#20,155,513
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,906
of 3,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,794
of 156,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.