↓ Skip to main content

From site-level to regional adaptation planning for tropical commodities: cocoa in West Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
From site-level to regional adaptation planning for tropical commodities: cocoa in West Africa
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11027-016-9707-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Götz Schroth, Peter Läderach, Armando Isaac Martinez-Valle, Christian Bunn

Abstract

The production of tropical agricultural commodities, such as cocoa (Theobroma cacao) and coffee (Coffea spp.), the countries and communities engaged in it, and the industries dependent on these commodities, are vulnerable to climate change. This is especially so where a large percentage of the global supply is grown in a single geographical region. Fortunately, there is often considerable spatial heterogeneity in the vulnerability to climate change within affected regions, implying that local production losses could be compensated through intensification and expansion of production elsewhere. However, this requires that site-level actions are integrated into a regional approach to climate change adaptation. We discuss here such a regional approach for cocoa in West Africa, where 70 % of global cocoa supply originates. On the basis of a statistical model of relative climatic suitability calibrated on West African cocoa farming areas and average climate projections for the 2030s and 2050s of, respectively, 15 and 19 Global Circulation Models, we divide the region into three adaptation zones: (i) a little affected zone permitting intensification and/or expansion of cocoa farming; (ii) a moderately affected zone requiring diversification and agronomic adjustments of farming practices; and (iii) a severely affected zone with need for progressive crop change. We argue that for tropical agricultural commodities, larger-scale adaptation planning that attempts to balance production trends across countries and regions could help reduce negative impacts of climate change on regional economies and global commodity supplies, despite the institutional challenges that this integration may pose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 23%
Researcher 34 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 37 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 43 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 24%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 5%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 48 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,884,135
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#456
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,809
of 303,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.