| Title |
Low MHC DRB class II diversity in the mountain goat: past bottlenecks and possible role of pathogens and parasites
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-006-9243-5 |
| Authors |
Julien Mainguy, Kirsty Worley, Steeve D. Côté, David W. Coltman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Afghanistan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 85 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,216,484
of 25,286,324 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#924
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,959
of 84,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,286,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.