↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of Deterministic, Reliability-Based Topology Optimization under Uncertainties

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
A Comparison of Deterministic, Reliability-Based Topology Optimization under Uncertainties
Published in
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/s0894-9166(16)60005-8
Authors

Qinghai Zhao, Xiaokai Chen, Zhengdong Ma, Yi Lin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 62%
Unspecified 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica
#15
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,618
of 406,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them