↓ Skip to main content

Bcl-2 is a critical mediator of intestinal transformation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bcl-2 is a critical mediator of intestinal transformation
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms10916
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maartje van der Heijden, Cheryl D. Zimberlin, Anna M. Nicholson, Selcuk Colak, Richard Kemp, Sybren L. Meijer, Jan Paul Medema, Florian R. Greten, Marnix Jansen, Douglas J. Winton, Louis Vermeulen

Abstract

Intestinal tumour formation is generally thought to occur following mutational events in the stem cell pool. However, active NF-κB signalling additionally facilitates malignant transformation of differentiated cells. We hypothesized that genes shared between NF-κB and intestinal stem cell (ISCs) signatures might identify common pathways that are required for malignant growth. Here, we find that the NF-κB target Bcl-2, an anti-apoptotic gene, is specifically expressed in ISCs in both mice and humans. Bcl-2 is dispensable in homeostasis and, although involved in protecting ISCs from radiation-induced damage, it is non-essential in tissue regeneration. Bcl-2 is upregulated in adenomas, and its loss or inhibition impairs outgrowth of oncogenic clones, because Bcl-2 alleviates apoptotic priming in epithelial cells following Apc loss. Furthermore, Bcl-2 expression in differentiated epithelial cells renders these cells amenable to clonogenic outgrowth. Collectively, our results indicate that Bcl-2 is required for efficient intestinal transformation following Apc-loss and constitutes a potential chemoprevention target.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 20%
Student > Master 22 15%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,793,546
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#43,296
of 47,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,519
of 300,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#795
of 887 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 887 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.