↓ Skip to main content

Objective method for classifying air masses: an application to the analysis of Buenos Aires’ (Argentina) urban heat island intensity

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Climatology, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Objective method for classifying air masses: an application to the analysis of Buenos Aires’ (Argentina) urban heat island intensity
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Climatology, January 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00704-002-0714-4
Authors

R. A. Bejarán, I. A. Camilloni

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 31%
Environmental Science 11 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Energy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#954
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,631
of 132,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.