| Title |
Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation in ICU adults: a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-016-4277-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurent Papazian, Amanda Corley, Dean Hess, John F. Fraser, Jean-Pierre Frat, Christophe Guitton, Samir Jaber, Salvatore M. Maggiore, Stefano Nava, Jordi Rello, Jean-Damien Ricard, François Stephan, Rocco Trisolini, Elie Azoulay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Argentina | 1 | 20% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 20% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 353 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 40 | 11% |
| Researcher | 38 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 8% |
| Other | 94 | 26% |
| Unknown | 90 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 194 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 101 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#8,827,916
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,346
of 5,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,717
of 318,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#66
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.