↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacist-Led Home Medicines Review and Residential Medication Management Review: The Australian Model

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacist-Led Home Medicines Review and Residential Medication Management Review: The Australian Model
Published in
Drugs & Aging, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40266-016-0357-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy F. Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 30 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 42 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 33 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#990
of 1,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,346
of 317,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.