↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
patent
9 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
389 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prognostic value of medulloblastoma extent of resection after accounting for molecular subgroup: a retrospective integrated clinical and molecular analysis
Published in
Lancet Oncology, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00581-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric M Thompson, Thomas Hielscher, Eric Bouffet, Marc Remke, Betty Luu, Sridharan Gururangan, Roger E McLendon, Darell D Bigner, Eric S Lipp, Sebastien Perreault, Yoon-Jae Cho, Gerald Grant, Seung-Ki Kim, Ji Yeoun Lee, Amulya A Nageswara Rao, Caterina Giannini, Kay Ka Wai Li, Ho-Keung Ng, Yu Yao, Toshihiro Kumabe, Teiji Tominaga, Wieslawa A Grajkowska, Marta Perek-Polnik, David C Y Low, Wan Tew Seow, Kenneth T E Chang, Jaume Mora, Ian F Pollack, Ronald L Hamilton, Sarah Leary, Andrew S Moore, Wendy J Ingram, Andrew R Hallahan, Anne Jouvet, Michelle Fèvre-Montange, Alexandre Vasiljevic, Cecile Faure-Conter, Tomoko Shofuda, Naoki Kagawa, Naoya Hashimoto, Nada Jabado, Alexander G Weil, Tenzin Gayden, Takafumi Wataya, Tarek Shalaby, Michael Grotzer, Karel Zitterbart, Jaroslav Sterba, Leos Kren, Tibor Hortobágyi, Almos Klekner, Bognár László, Tímea Pócza, Peter Hauser, Ulrich Schüller, Shin Jung, Woo-Youl Jang, Pim J French, Johan M Kros, Marie-Lise C van Veelen, Luca Massimi, Jeffrey R Leonard, Joshua B Rubin, Rajeev Vibhakar, Lola B Chambless, Michael K Cooper, Reid C Thompson, Claudia C Faria, Alice Carvalho, Sofia Nunes, José Pimentel, Xing Fan, Karin M Muraszko, Enrique López-Aguilar, David Lyden, Livia Garzia, David J H Shih, Noriyuki Kijima, Christian Schneider, Jennifer Adamski, Paul A Northcott, Marcel Kool, David T W Jones, Jennifer A Chan, Ana Nikolic, Maria Luisa Garre, Erwin G Van Meir, Satoru Osuka, Jeffrey J Olson, Arman Jahangiri, Brandyn A Castro, Nalin Gupta, William A Weiss, Iska Moxon-Emre, Donald J Mabbott, Alvaro Lassaletta, Cynthia E Hawkins, Uri Tabori, James Drake, Abhaya Kulkarni, Peter Dirks, James T Rutka, Andrey Korshunov, Stefan M Pfister, Roger J Packer, Vijay Ramaswamy, Michael D Taylor

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 381 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 43 11%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 33 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 8%
Student > Master 30 8%
Other 72 19%
Unknown 136 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 8%
Neuroscience 26 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 2%
Other 32 8%
Unknown 150 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2026.
All research outputs
#2,405,369
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#2,515
of 8,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,713
of 339,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#34
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.