↓ Skip to main content

Multi-purpose fossils? The reappraisal of an Elephas antiquus molar from El Pirulejo (Magdalenian; Córdoba, Spain)

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Multi-purpose fossils? The reappraisal of an Elephas antiquus molar from El Pirulejo (Magdalenian; Córdoba, Spain)
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12520-016-0324-1
Authors

Miguel Cortés-Sánchez, Arturo Morales-Muñiz, Francisco Jiménez-Espejo, Marina Évora, María Dolores Simón-Vallejo, Antonio García-Alix, Aránzazu Martínez Aguirre, José Antonio Riquelme-Cantal, Carlos P. Odriozola, Rubén Parrilla Giráldez, Diego J. Álvarez-Lao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 6 23%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 9 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2016.
All research outputs
#15,364,458
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#558
of 792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,538
of 300,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.