↓ Skip to main content

Long-term fitness consequences of breeding density in starling colonies: an observational approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Long-term fitness consequences of breeding density in starling colonies: an observational approach
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10336-019-01674-7
Authors

Daniel Fuentes, Juan G. Rubalcaba, José P. Veiga, Vicente Polo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 27%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,575,425
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#1,390
of 1,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,672
of 350,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.