↓ Skip to main content

Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants

Overview of attention for article published in Functional Ecology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 2,810)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
106 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants
Published in
Functional Ecology, March 2016
DOI 10.1111/1365-2435.12644
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dara A Stanley, Nigel E Raine

Abstract

Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies.Increased use of pesticides has caused concern over sublethal effects on bees, such as impacts on reproduction or learning ability. However, little is known about how sublethal exposure to field-realistic levels of pesticide might affect the ability of bees to visit and manipulate flowers.We observed the behaviour of individual bumblebees from colonies chronically exposed to a neonicotinoid pesticide (10 ppb thiamethoxam) or control solutions foraging for the first time on an array of morphologically complex wildflowers (Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium repens) in an outdoor flight arena.We found that more bees released from pesticide-treated colonies became foragers, and that they visited more L. corniculatus flowers than controls. Interestingly, bees exposed to pesticide collected pollen more often than controls, but control bees learnt to handle flowers efficiently after fewer learning visits than bees exposed to pesticide. There were also different initial floral preferences of our treatment groups; control bees visited a higher proportion of T. repens flowers, and bees exposed to pesticide were more likely to choose L. corniculatus on their first visit.Our results suggest that the foraging behaviour of bumblebees on real flowers can be altered by sublethal exposure to field-realistic levels of pesticide. This has implications for the foraging success and persistence of bumblebee colonies, but perhaps more importantly for the interactions between wild plants and flower-visiting insects and ability of bees to deliver the crucial pollination services to plants necessary for ecosystem functioning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 245 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 19%
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Other 13 5%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 46 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 46%
Environmental Science 38 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 60 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 326. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#103,689
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Functional Ecology
#17
of 2,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,848
of 315,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Functional Ecology
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.